I feel so gypped by this game, that I felt it necessary to make and account and give a review. Pretext: this is my first review on Metacritic. I just want to be honest this game is NOT a 0 but it is NOT a 10 by any means. Missing enemies like giant worm, Grave digger and spider - No mulp endings. The original game has these quick time events where you had to make decisions that really effected game play and enhanced re-playability and because that was neglected that game feels linear and empty. The story was so poorly written and that pacing felt so rushed that characters never got a chance to have the interactions they needed for the story to feel right. The game did not feel like a city if felt like 2 blocks of a town and that is a huge problem. There are too many landmarks in the city missing, No clock tower (mostly), No Raccon Park, No graveyard, No gas station, No newspaper building, No Mayor statues. This game sacrificed having a big city to explore to becoming something that felt empty and horribly linear. NO RE-PLAYABILITY (harder modes do not count) -The puzzles are too easy to the point where it is embarrassing.
+ Changing Jill's design makes more sense because the original tube top and mini shirt just don't make sense.
#Resident evil 3 remake plot holes series
+++ The end game timer does not count the cut-scenes & the cinematic moments +/- First of all the game is too short but that has never been a problem for the RE series BUT it is here because there are no branching paths that make you want to play the game again. + The dodging mechanic is back and it feels good when you get it right! A very good add to this game. + The power station bug section is amazing and unique and the game needed a lot more of those sections. + Nemesis feels more like a treating than ever in terms of strength, and speed. In a remake I feel like they need to add more not take more out. MY BIGGEST PROBLEM with this remake is that if feels like they took more out of game compared to the original and it feels rushed and empty.
It IS WORTH playing but you are not going to want to replay this one. In a remake I Proof that better graphics do not make for a better game. Proof that better graphics do not make for a better game. Again, this is a good game, and If you can handle the presence of some cut parts, along with pretty iconic ones being completely changed, then give it a go, is still a good game for the newcomers, even If the original one was way better. as one of the many devoted fans, we are the one that kept the series going, and we honestly deserve better than this. The game decides to cut some of its more iconic moments: such as Brad Vicker's death by Nemesis, or the entire clock tower section, in favour of a single-player campaign that serves as a side dish for the Resident Evil Resistance multiplayer mode, and It's really disappointing. Don't get me wrong, is still a game with stunning graphics and good new ideas but, as the Resident Evil 1 Remake teaches us: don't cut content, instead, expand on the original available source that's how remakes should be done. but at 21 years old, and after having played both titles, after the credits started to roll in, I felt extremely disappointed. Don't get me wrong, is still a game with stunning graphics and good new ideas but, as the Resident Evil 1 Remake teaches us: don't cut content, instead, expand on the original available source that's how remakes should be Call me delusional, call me nostalgic.
0 kommentar(er)
